And further more it is a bug because if you read carefully the description of Miscreated monster's ally protection skill, it says that when an ALLY gets hit while under the skill the hitter gets feared, but hitting the monster is fine. But again, the ally protection on Miscreated monster is cast by another heroe wich may have totally different mechanism and in this case it does. A complex description, but with fewer words: when hitting Miscreated monster while it is under ally protection, you should not get Fear on you.

And further more it is a bug because if you read carefully the description of Miscreated monster's ally protection skill, it says that when an ALLY gets hit while under the skill the hitter gets feared, but hitting the monster is fine. But again, the ally protection on Miscreated monster is cast by another heroe wich may have totally different mechanism and in this case it does. A complex description, but with fewer words: when hitting Miscreated monster while it is under ally protection, you should not get Fear on you.

Yeah but why does provoke work differently then? For example, when 2 different heroes do provoke on 2 defferent foes, each foe attacks the hero that casted provoke on him. In this case the skill mechanism of one hero, effects the same hero and it shouldn't because the skill description of MM and Skullcrusher are very different. The first one does fear, the second one doesn't.

nlz said:

Yeah but why does provoke work differently then? For example, when 2 different heroes do provoke on 2 defferent foes, each foe attacks the hero that casted provoke on him. In this case the skill mechanism of one hero, effects the same hero and it shouldn't because the skill description of MM and Skullcrusher are very different. The first one does fear, the second one doesn't.

You're missing the point - MM's passive states 'Places a [Fear] debuff on the attacker for 1 turn whenever an ally is attacked while under an [Ally Protection] buff.' This is an entirely separate skill from his A3 which puts ally protect - that A3 mentions nothing about Fear. 

So there's no reason why the ally protection buff referred to in that passive skill has to be the one that MM puts with his A3. If MM never uses his A3 and never puts any Ally Protection at all, but Skullcrusher does, then MM's passive will still work based on SC's ally protect, as it should. 

nlz said:

Yeah but why does provoke work differently then? For example, when 2 different heroes do provoke on 2 defferent foes, each foe attacks the hero that casted provoke on him. In this case the skill mechanism of one hero, effects the same hero and it shouldn't because the skill description of MM and Skullcrusher are very different. The first one does fear, the second one doesn't.

You're missing the point - MM's passive states 'Places a [Fear] debuff on the attacker for 1 turn whenever an ally is attacked while under an [Ally Protection] buff.' This is an entirely separate skill from his A3 which puts ally protect - that A3 mentions nothing about Fear. 

So there's no reason why the ally protection buff referred to in that passive skill has to be the one that MM puts with his A3. If MM never uses his A3 and never puts any Ally Protection at all, but Skullcrusher does, then MM's passive will still work based on SC's ally protect, as it should.